The Federal Solar Tax Credit Is Now Officially Closed for New Projects — Here's What's Actually Left
As of today, July 4, 2026, there is no federal tax credit available for a new owned residential solar system. The Section 48E construction-start deadline — the last open federal door — just closed. This is the definitive, plain-English guide to what ended, what remains, and exactly what to do next. It is the post-deadline companion to ourU.S. Solar Hub and our earlierfinancing-inversion analysis.
The short version (TL;DR)
Two federal pathways for residential solar are now closed fornew projects:
- Section 25D (the 30% owned-residential credit) expired December 31, 2025. An owned system placed in service in 2026 receives $0 in federal credit.
- Section 48E construction-start window closedJuly 4, 2026. New projects can no longer begin construction in time to qualify.
The only remaining federal solar path is alease or PPA on a project that already began construction before July 4, 2026 — and that pipeline is finite. Once developers exhaust their pre-deadline projects, even the lease/PPA federal benefit disappears. After that, residential solar economics rest entirely on state incentives,local buyback plans, andself-consumption value.
The one red flag to watch for
Any 2026 quote that still shows a "30% federal tax credit" on anowned residential system is either mistaken or misleading. That credit ended December 31, 2025. If a 30% line item appears on a cash or loan quote, ask the installer to remove it and re-quote — or find a different installer.How to detect expired ITC claims in a quote →
What actually ended, and when
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) rewrote the clean-energy tax code in mid-2025 with a cascade of hard statutory deadlines. Two of them directly killed the residential solar credit stack:
| Pathway | What it was | Date it ended |
|---|---|---|
| Section 25D | 30% federal credit on an owned residential system | Dec 31, 2025 (expired) |
| Section 48E construction-start | Last chance to begin a project that can still claim the 30% business credit (lease/PPA/commercial) | July 4, 2026 (passed) |
| 48E full phase-out | Projects already in construction can still complete and claim through the end of 2027 | Dec 31, 2027 (future) |
The 48E phase-out is important to understand: July 4, 2026 (a Saturday; under IRC 7503 the effective deadline rolled to Monday, July 6, 2026) was the deadline to begin construction, not to finish it. Projects that were already in the ground (or that met the 5% safe-harbor expenditure test, which was restored by a federal court on June 6, 2026 in Oregon Environmental Council v. IRS, No. CV-25-4400) can still be completed and can still claim 48E through the 2027 phase-out. The IRS may appeal the safe-harbor ruling, so construction-status documentation matters more than ever.
What this means in practice: there is afinite pipeline of qualifying 48E projects — systems developers started before July 4. As that pipeline is absorbed by lease and PPA customers over the next 12–18 months, the federal benefit disappears entirely from the residential market.
Where payback stands now: post-48E by state
With the federal credit gone, payback is now set entirely by your state's cost-per-watt, electricity rate, and state/local incentive stack. The chart below shows post-48E payback across all 50 states plus DC for a typical 7 kW system on a $150/mo bill. Tap any state for detail; re-sort by cost-per-watt or by incentive stack value.
Post-48E payback by state
7 kW system, $150/mo bill, $0 federal ITC. Tap a bar for details.
- TX7.5 yr
- CO8.0 yr
- DC8.3 yr
- NY9.2 yr
- AZ9.6 yr
- FL10.1 yr
- MS10.1 yr
- SC10.1 yr
- IN10.3 yr
- MD10.4 yr
- AL10.5 yr
- WV10.6 yr
- PA10.8 yr
- GA10.8 yr
- LA10.8 yr
- WI10.8 yr
- VA10.8 yr
- OH10.8 yr
- IL10.8 yr
- MI10.9 yr
- NJ11.0 yr
- CT11.1 yr
- NC11.3 yr
- DE11.3 yr
- TN11.4 yr
- KY11.5 yr
- MA11.5 yr
- KS11.6 yr
- AK11.7 yr
- AR11.7 yr
- CA11.9 yr
- ME11.9 yr
- VT11.9 yr
- HI12.0 yr
- NM12.3 yr
- NH12.3 yr
- OK12.5 yr
- NV12.6 yr
- RI12.6 yr
- MO12.9 yr
- SD13.0 yr
- WY13.6 yr
- MN13.7 yr
- NE14.0 yr
- OR14.2 yr
- IA14.3 yr
- UT14.7 yr
- MT15.7 yr
- ND16.2 yr
- WA16.8 yr
- ID17.1 yr
Option 1 — Lease or PPA via 48E passthrough (the only federal path left)
For new contracts signed in mid-to-late 2026, alease or PPA is the only structure that can still deliver any federal solar value to a homeowner — and only if the developer's underlying project began construction before July 4, 2026. Here's the mechanism, in plain English:
- The developer — not you — owns the system and claims the 30% Section 48E credit on their corporate tax return.
- The developer passes that value through to you as a lower monthly payment (or a lower per-kWh PPA rate) than would otherwise be possible.
- You get solar on your roof with little or no money down, and the federal credit shows up indirectly as a cheaper contract.
The math on this flipped in 2026. A cash or loan buyer now receives$0 federal credit (25D expired), while a lease/PPA buyer on a 48E-qualifying pipeline project still captures the value indirectly. For mid-bill homeowners, that is often enough to make the lease lifetime cost lower than cash. We unpack this in detail in ourpost-25D financing-inversion guide; for the passthrough mechanics specifically, see our48E passthrough guide.
The catch: this window is now closing for new contracts. As developers exhaust their pre-July-6 construction-start pipeline, new lease/PPA offers will lose the 48E passthrough value too. If you are considering a lease, ask the developer directly whether the specific project on your roof qualifies for 48E — and get it in writing.
Visualizing the ITC gap: 25-year cumulative savings
The chart below shows the difference the federal credit makes (or rather, made). For a national-average 7 kW system on a $150/mo bill, the post-48E path crosses break-even years later than the pre-48E path would have. The eco-green markers indicate the year cumulative savings finally exceed net system cost under each scenario.
25-year cumulative savings: with vs. without federal ITC
Default 7 kW system, $150/mo bill, 2.5%/yr electricity escalation. Markers show the year cumulative savings cross net system cost.
- Federal ITC value
- $5,985
- Δ Net cost
- +$5,985
- Break-even w/ ITC
- Yr 8
- Break-even post-48E
- Yr 10
The gap between the two lines is exactly the19.32¢/kWh federal-credit subsidy that no longer exists for owned residential systems. Lease/PPA deals that capture 48E effectively shift you closer to the lower (gray) curve by passing through some of that value as a lower monthly payment.
Option 2 — State incentives that still exist
Federal credit is gone, but roughly 13 states (plus D.C. and Puerto Rico) run their own solar incentive programs. These are now the single biggest variable in whether solar makes sense for a direct buyer in 2026 — and they stack on top of (zero) federal. The strongest remaining programs:
Editor's curated shortlist of the strongest remaining state programs. Full 50-state reference table below.
| State | Program | Value | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| New York | NYSERDA NY-Sun incentive | ~$0.20–0.40/W (step-based, declining) | Megawatt-block incentive paid per watt DC; lower in downstate/NYC blocks, higher upstate. Stacks with the 25% state income-tax credit (up to $5,000). |
| Massachusetts | SMART (Solar Massachusetts Renewable Target) | Tariff-based per-kWh payments (~$0.03/kWh), 20-yr term | Performance incentive; adders for storage, low-income, and brownfield. Municipal-light-plant territories sit outside SMART. Payments pending DPU approval of company-specific tariffs. |
| Iowa | Iowa Solar Energy System Tax Credit | 50% of the federal basis × state credit rate (capped) | Tied to the federal basis; with 25D gone the basis for owned residential has collapsed, so the state credit value has shrunk dramatically — confirm before relying on it. |
| New Mexico | Solar Market Development Tax Credit | 10% of cost, up to $6,000 | Refundable state credit with an annual aggregate cap; administered by NM Energy, Minerals & Natural Resources Dept. Reservations fill fast. |
| South Carolina | SC Solar Energy Tax Credit | 25% of cost, $3,500/yr cap (carryforward) | Uncapped total but a $3,500/year annual claim ceiling means a full 8 kW system credit ratchets out over several years. |
| Illinois | Illinois Shines (Adjustable Block Program) | SREC payments, 5–7-yr contracts | SREC-based production incentive for systems under 25 kW; payment levels step down as blocks fill. Smaller upfront payment option in some categories. |
| Maryland | Clean Energy Production Tax Credit + SRECs | $1,000 + ~$50/SREC market | State production credit (capped aggregate) plus a liquid SREC market (~$50/SREC) that a broker can monetize annually. |
| Oregon | Energy Trust of Oregon (PGE/Pacific Power) | ~$0.20–0.40/W (varies by utility) | Utility-funded, not a state tax credit — available inside PGE and Pacific Power territories. Plus a 1.5% OR solar rebate program for low-income households. |
State incentive availability after the federal ITC
Federal residential ITC is $0 nationwide (post-48E). State and local programs are the swing factor. Values: 7 kW system scenario.
| Status | ||
|---|---|---|
| AlabamaAL | — | None |
| AlaskaAK | — | None |
| ArizonaAZ | $1,000 | Active |
| ArkansasAR | — | None |
| CaliforniaCA | — | Funding uncertain |
| ColoradoCO | $7,000 | Active |
| ConnecticutCT | $1,750 | Active |
| DelawareDE | $357 | Active |
| District of ColumbiaDC | $7,384 | Active |
| FloridaFL | — | None |
| GeorgiaGA | — | None |
| HawaiiHI | $35 | Active |
| IdahoID | — | None |
| IllinoisIL | $771 | Active |
| IndianaIN | — | None |
| IowaIA | — | None |
| KansasKS | — | None |
| KentuckyKY | — | None |
| LouisianaLA | — | None |
| MaineME | — | None |
| MarylandMD | $1,510 | Active |
| MassachusettsMA | $1,000 | Active |
| MichiganMI | — | None |
| MinnesotaMN | — | None |
| MississippiMS | — | None |
| MissouriMO | — | None |
| MontanaMT | — | None |
| NebraskaNE | — | None |
| NevadaNV | — | None |
| New HampshireNH | — | None |
| New JerseyNJ | $786 | Active |
| New MexicoNM | $10 | Active |
| New YorkNY | $5,204 | Active |
| North CarolinaNC | $51 | Active |
| North DakotaND | — | None |
| OhioOH | $102 | Active |
| OklahomaOK | — | None |
| OregonOR | $50 | Active |
| PennsylvaniaPA | $255 | Active |
| Rhode IslandRI | — | None |
| South CarolinaSC | $25 | Active |
| South DakotaSD | — | None |
| TennesseeTN | — | None |
| TexasTX | $4,000 | Active |
| UtahUT | — | None |
| VermontVT | — | None |
| VirginiaVA | $153 | Active |
| WashingtonWA | — | None |
| West VirginiaWV | — | None |
| WisconsinWI | — | None |
| WyomingWY | — | None |
Methodology:Stack value = state tax credit + utility rebate (per-watt or flat) + year-1 SREC income at a 7 kW default system. Property and sales tax exemptions are listed but not monetized. Federal ITC is shown as $0 because Section 25D expired Dec 31, 2025 and the Section 48E construction-start deadline passed July 4, 2026.
These programs change — caps fill, steps decline, legislatures tinker. The authoritative source is thestate solar tax credits guideand ourincentive finder, which pulls the current numbers for your ZIP code. The point: in a high-incentive state, direct ownership can still pencil out in 2026 even without the federal credit. In a zero-incentive state, it usually cannot.
Option 3 — Standalone battery storage
A battery was never the main 25D claim (most homeowners claimed the credit on the solar array, with storage as a paired add-on), so the end of 25D did not collapse storage economics on its own. What it did do is shift the entire storage value proposition ontostate and utility programs plusresilience and arbitrage value.
The strongest 2026 storage economics are:
- California SGIP equity tiers — $850–1,000/kWh for income-qualified and disadvantaged-community households, which can nearly cover a battery's cost. (General Market funds are largely waitlisted.)
- Utility VPP and buyback programs — Tesla Electric, Base Power, and similar programs in ERCOT pay homeowners for dispatching stored energy during scarcity events.
- Resilience value — in states with frequent outages (Texas winter storms, California PSPS, hurricane regions), backup alone can justify a battery even with zero incentive.
See our battery payback calculatorand the state-by-state battery rebate guide.
Option 4 — Wait for legislative action (be realistic)
Some homeowners are holding off, hoping Congress restores a solar credit. Be honest with yourself about the odds.
- No pending bill restores 25D. There is no realistic legislative vehicle moving in 2026 that would bring back the 30% owned-residential credit.
- Any restoration would be prospective. Even if a future Congress passed a new credit, it would apply to systems installed after enactment (next tax year at the earliest), not retroactively to a system you install today.
- State programs keep moving regardless. Waiting means watching the strongest state incentive steps (NY-Sun, SMART, Illinois Shines) fill and step down while you wait for a federal restoration that may never come.
The pragmatic stance: plan as if the federal credit is gone permanently. If a future Congress restores something, treat it as upside — but do not anchor your 2026 solar decision to a hypothetical Washington vote.
Decision framework — which path fits you
| Your situation | Best 2026 path |
|---|---|
| Cash-rich, strong state incentive (NY/MA/NM/SC/IL) | Direct ownership — stack the state credit + property-tax exemption. Federal is gone but the state stack still produces a competitive payback. |
| Mid-bill, weak credit or no upfront capital | Lease or PPA on a 48E-qualifying pipeline project (if one is still available in your area). Captures federal value indirectly while the window lasts. |
| Resilience-focused (frequent outages, medical needs) | Solar + battery, sized for backup. Justify on resilience first, economics second. Stack any state storage rebate and a utility VPP/buyback program. |
| Low-rate, low-sun, no state incentive | Wait — direct ownership now struggles and lease value is marginal. Re-evaluate if rates rise, a state program launches, or equipment prices drop further. |
| Already in construction before July 4, 2026 | Complete the project and claim 48E (if lease/PPA/business) — you locked in the credit. Document construction-start evidence and FEOC compliance. |
The national residential rate sits at about19.32¢/kWh (EIA April 2026), which is high enough that solar still offsets meaningful spend in most of the country — the question is no longer "does solar work?" but "which structure captures the most value in a post-credit world?"
Where things stand now
July 4, 2026 is the day the federal residential solar credit era ended for new projects. There is no graceful extension and no hidden workaround — 25D is expired, the 48E construction-start window is closed, and what remains is a finite lease/PPA pipeline plus whatever your state and utility offer. Solar still works in 2026, but the optimal path now depends entirely onwhere you live andhow you finance. Run your actual numbers, get competing cash and lease quotes, and ignore any 30% federal line item on a 2026 owned-system quote.
Tax guidance is general and educational, not individualized advice. Confirm current program status, caps, and eligibility with the administering agency (IRS for 25D/48E; your state energy office or utility for state programs) before relying on any figure here. The 48E 5% safe-harbor restoration (Oregon Environmental Council v. IRS, No. CV-25-4400, June 6, 2026) may be appealed; verify current status before claiming.
Questions & answers
Can I still get the federal solar tax credit in 2026?
For a new owned residential system, no. The Section 25D residential credit (30%) expired December 31, 2025, and the Section 48E construction-start window closed July 4, 2026. The only remaining federal solar path is a lease or PPA where the developer claims 48E on a project that already began construction and passes the value through via lower payments — and that window is now closing for brand-new contracts because new projects can no longer start construction in time to qualify.
Is solar still worth it in 2026 without the federal credit?
In much of the country, yes — but the math is tighter and depends heavily on your local rate and buyback plan. Without the 30% federal credit, an owned system's effective cost is ~43% higher than it was in 2024. In high-rate states (California, the Northeast) solar still pays back, just slower. In low-rate, low-sun states, direct ownership now struggles. The strongest 2026 play for mid-bill homeowners is often a lease or PPA that still captures the 48E value. Run the numbers on your actual bill before deciding.
Will the 30% solar tax credit come back?
Not under current law, and no pending bill would restore it. Any new residential credit would have to be enacted by Congress and would almost certainly be prospective (applying to next tax year at the earliest, not retroactively to a system you install today). Plan as if the federal credit is gone permanently. If a future Congress restores something, treat it as upside — do not bank on it.
Can I claim Section 48E myself as a homeowner?
Generally no. 48E is a business/investment credit claimed by the entity that owns the system and has tax liability at the entity level — typically the developer in a lease or PPA. A homeowner with an owned residential system claims under 25D, which is now expired. The practical way a homeowner benefits from 48E in 2026 is indirectly: sign a lease/PPA with a developer whose project pipeline already began construction before July 4, 2026, and the developer passes the credit value through as a lower monthly payment.
I began construction before July 4, 2026 — what do I do?
Document everything and complete the project. To qualify for 48E you had to meet either the Physical Work Test (significant on-site or off-site construction began) or the 5% safe-harbor expenditure test (which was restored June 6, 2026 by the federal court in Oregon Environmental Council v. IRS, No. CV-25-4400 — though the IRS may appeal). Keep your binding contract, progress invoices, FEOC certifications, and evidence of when physical work or 5% spend occurred. The system must still be placed in service and the credit claimed through 2027's phase-out.
Do state solar incentives still exist after the federal credit ended?
Yes — roughly 13 states plus D.C. and Puerto Rico have their own solar credits, rebates, or SREC markets. The strongest are New York (NY-Sun + a 25% state credit), Massachusetts (SMART), New Mexico (10% refundable, up to $6,000), South Carolina (25%, $3,500/yr), Illinois (Illinois Shines SRECs), Iowa, Maryland, and Oregon (Energy Trust). These stack on top of (now-zero) federal incentives and can materially change the payback math in their states.
What about battery storage — does it still get a credit?
For a new owned residential battery, no federal credit remains — standalone storage was never a primary 25D claim and 25D is expired. A leased/PPA battery in a project that began construction before July 4, 2026 can still capture 48E through the developer. The real storage economics in 2026 come from state/utility programs: California's SGIP equity tiers ($850–1,000/kWh), utility VPP and buyback programs, and resilience value. In deregulated markets like ERCOT, batteries are increasingly justified on backup + scarcity arbitrage alone.
Should I lease or buy solar in 2026?
For most mid-bill homeowners in 2026, a lease or PPA now produces a lower lifetime cost than cash, because the developer can still claim 48E on a pre-July-6 construction-start pipeline and pass that value through — while a cash buyer gets $0 federal credit. This is the post-25D "financing inversion." Cash still wins if you have the capital, live in a strong state-incentive state, and value owning the asset outright. Compare both paths with your actual usage and local rate, not a generic rule of thumb.
What should I do RIGHT NOW if I was about to buy solar?
Three steps. First, if any installer quotes a 30% federal tax credit on a 2026 owned residential system, walk away — that credit expired December 31, 2025, and the quote is either mistaken or misleading. Second, get competing lease AND cash quotes so you can see the post-inversion difference on your roof. Third, before signing, check your state's incentive programs (DSIRE) and your local utility's buyback plan — in deregulated markets like Texas, the buyback plan you choose can swing payback by years.
Related reading & tools
OBBBA Deadline Tracker
Live countdown of every OBBBA tax-credit deadline
Solar ROI Calculator
Model your payback with your own usage and rate
Incentive Finder
Every program you qualify for, by ZIP code
Financing Comparison
Cash vs. loan vs. lease vs. PPA, post-25D
Post-25D Financing Inversion
Why lease/PPA now beats cash for most homeowners
State Solar Tax Credits Guide
Every state credit, rebate, and SREC program
48E Passthrough Guide
How lease/PPA providers pass through the federal credit
U.S. Solar Hub 2026
National cost, payback, and rate data